Look
closely at the accompanying painting of King Shaka ka Senzangakhona, twelfth
king of the Zulu nation. The original work was painted several years ago by the
author of this blog, in oils.
King Shaka of the Zulus |
It is a
truthful interpretation, based on forty years of research including the historical
testimony of the trader and friend of the king Henry Francis Fynn. It is arguably
the most accurate representation of the Zulu king anywhere in the world. The
image is offered as a standard for other portrayals. It provides the cover for the
historical novel ‘Shaka, the story of a Zulu king’, found elsewhere on the
website that supports this blog.
The Zulu
king was known for his stature and magnificent physical presence. He projected
dignity and a sense of command, was powerful in build and indeed displayed
‘remarkable athletic ability’ according to the testimony of Isaacs, one of the
traders of his time.
Since
Shaka’s death in 1828, many artists have tried to portray him in paintings or
sculpture. From the often bizarre works seen, one concludes it to be a difficult
task.
The build
should be even more muscular and athletic than most of the earlier attempts,
showing a man whose tall stature was instantly recognizable in a crowd. The posture should be alert, coiled, prepared
for action; for he was a man attuned to the nuances of the times and ready for any
challenge.
Anyone
wishing to do justice to the Zulu king through medium of sculpture would
require a figure at least three metres in height to give the necessary weight
to his presence, while not being banal for its reliance on massive proportions
alone.
King Shaka
was a man of considerable intelligence who planned complex campaigns with great
insight, undertook the training of his irresistible fighting forces with great
skill and managed the integration of numerous lesser tribes and clans into the
growing Zulu nation.
It was a
task requiring considerable gathering and processing of information, logical,
rational, critical and creative thinking, and an acute ability to understand
how social systems work. Engineering the
stabbing spear, designing the battle-formation for attack modeled on the
olden-time hunting tactics of a Zulu family, implementation of complex social
and legal systems, and leadership of the First Fruits and other ceremonies
showed much creative flair.
The manner
in which he overcame the intrigues of rebellious sangomas and the deception
with which he enticed and lured into ambush several invading Ndwandwe hordes
from the northern lands around the Pongola river also reveal his ability to
think divergently. His was a considerable intellect.
There were notable examples of honourable conduct on the king’s part, admiration for bravery and the discharge of duty, forgiveness for those who spoke the truth boldly, and compassion for the poorest amongst the nation. Despite his gravitas, there were glimpses of humour at times. With the later politicization of the king’s record, those who wished to discredit him neatly omitted these attributes while magnifying the harsher side of a harsh reality.
Yet even
the most brutal of the recorded methods of punishment used by the Zulus of the
time were no worse than what was done at the same time in apparently
‘civilized’ nations such as England and France. There, terrible procedures of
hanging, drawing and quartering had been used for more than five hundred years.
In current times, savage and ferocious forms of execution still persist in many
parts of the world.
Any statue
must reflect a penetrating intelligence and the dignity befitting a man of
massive presence and gravitas. He need
not be particularly handsome, since there is no clear record of his features,
yet the sculptor must shy away from portrayals that do not get the features
anatomically in proportion. The face must be absolutely right, and it must be
strong.
For
decoration and a display of power, King Shaka had a band of strung lion’s teeth
encircling his neck. In less formal
attire he wore tassels and even genet skin. He sported a loin covering of
assorted samango monkey, genet and other tails (the isinene) of a length
befitting a senior man, and wore a soft antelope-skin covering (ubeshu) hanging
to behind his knees in his mature years.
His full
headdress was magnificent, being usually bedecked with an apron of red purple-crested
lourie (touraco) feathers inserted in a thick band of leopard skin or brown
otter pelt, all surmounted by a sixty centimetre long blue crane feather at the
front. Around each upper arm and lower leg was a tassel made of long bleached
hair derived from the extremities of cattle tails.
Plugs of
shiny yellow cane were inserted in his ear lobes. The clash and contrast of the
primary colours; blue (the crane feather), red (lourie feathers) and yellow
(cane for the ear decorations) was impressive.
His weapons
consisted of a great white shield taller than most men, made of double-layered
cattle hide with a small black patch the size of the open human hand slightly
offset at the center. It was a blemish to show that even the king did not
regard himself as perfect. The shield
must be that engineered by the Zulu king, and not the smaller version that
crept in during ensuing years under Kings Dingane, Mpande and Cetshwayo.
His spear
was the iklwa! stabbing spear, a metre long with a massive, razor-sharp
hammered-iron blade. The wood was flared at the lower extremity so that it
would be secure in the king’s grasp during battle. It must be displayed in the
right hand, held low since the attacking thrust was upwards under the ribcage,
and not a futile overhand jab.
The image should
preferably show the King in full battle dress, something like the miniature
displayed in the Old Courthouse Museum in Durban. He might be leaning slightly forward, or at
least be balanced to show a powerful, coiled posture from which action will
erupt.
Considering
the emotive hold the image has over the Zulu nation of 9 million people, it is
advisable to get the image correct. Our Zulus don’t take kindly to any slight
directed to their kingly lineage.
Constructive comments are welcome
ReplyDelete